Resize Font Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size Reset Font Size

Home / Seafood / Headlines

September 18, 2008
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


School of Fish (Thought) Swims Back To Common Sense

School of Fish (Thought) Swims Back To Common Sense

If you’ve been reading the news lately, and you’re pregnant, you’d almost be forgiven for thinking that fish was safe to eat again. (Guess what? It always was.) Evidence continues to pile up that scaring women away from the seafood counter during their child-bearing years is nothing short of public health malpractice.

In the spring, a small study published in the American Journal of Epidemiology found that women who ate more than two servings of fish per week during pregnancy had kids who performed better on tests of verbal, visual and motor development. Since two weekly servings of fish is the maximum our federal government’s health advisory permits for pregnant women, it seems the best way to protect our children is to ignore that advice.

And now, a truly huge studyappearing in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that “children whose mothers ate the most fish during pregnancy were more likely to have better motor and cognitive skills.” Harvard researchers studied more than 25,000 children and the pregnancy diets of their mothers. As The Washington Post reported Tuesday:

The more fish a woman eats [during pregnancy], the better her infant's physical and cognitive abilities are. Infants whose mothers ate fish were able to sit, talk and walk sooner than infants whose mothers didn’t eat fish.

Add to this the sobering news in our recent report, “Tuna Meltdown: How Green Groups and the Federal Government Put America’s Poorest Children at Risk.” Using data from independent sources, we found that between 2000 and 2006 more than 250,000 children were born into the poorest U.S. households where women weren’t eating any fish. (Click here to download the report.)

Evidence goes in. Conclusions come out. Two in particular are coming more and more sharply into focus.

First, despite trace levels of mercury that have always been present in vanishingly tiny levels, eating generous amounts of fish during pregnancy doesn’t harm developing fetuses. It helps them.

And second, those responsible for whipping up needless fear about mercury in the first place -- namely federal government regulators and environmental activists -- put a national food scare in motion that has ended up hurting America’s poorest children.

We call ‘em like we see ‘em.

email us comments



printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list
Headlines


Organic Activist Complaints Smell Fishy
Posted On: Thursday 11/20/2008

Pregnant Women Shouldn’t Swallow Mercury Scares
Posted On: Wednesday 11/12/2008

The Fish Is Fine (But The Mug May Kill You)
Posted On: Monday 10/27/2008

Is Something Fishy? Yep. Mercury-Scare Activists.
Posted On: Thursday 10/23/2008

Greenpeace Science: Fishy and Illiterate, As Usual
Posted On: Monday 10/13/2008

School of Fish (Thought) Swims Back To Common Sense
Posted On: Thursday 9/18/2008

Report: Mercury-Fish Hype Put Poor Children At Risk
Posted On: Wednesday 9/3/2008

Phony Health Experts Continue Seafood Smear Campaign
Posted On: Tuesday 5/13/2008

TV Talking Heads Rarely Major In Math. Or Science.
Posted On: Friday 4/25/2008


ActivistCash.com

SeaWeb
Background | Quotes | Financials
What can you say about a group of alarmist publicity-seekers whose greatest passion is “saving” fish species that aren’t even endangered? Sadly, SeaWeb is just one in a long line of recent entrants into the food-scare industry. read more here »

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
Background | Quotes | Financials
Though self-named a “Conservation Society,” Sea Shepherd is a violent organization. “We’re not a protest organization, we’re a policing organization,” Paul Watson has said of his organization, however its purpose is to ram and sink ships making it more of a pirate crew. read more here »

Op-Eds

The mercury-in-the-fish story
Americans have been drowning in stories about “toxic” tuna sushi and high mercury levels in fish. read more here »

Mercury Risk? Scares mislead American consumers
How tiny are the traces of mercury in fish? University of Rochester scientists report in the New England Journal of Medicine that there haven't been any clinical reports of fish-related mercury poisoning since the 1950s and 1960s. read more here »


About Us | Contact Us | Please Help Us | Site Map
Ad Campaigns | Press Center | Daily News Archive | Email Subscription | Op-Eds | Cartoons | Games | Link To Us
Copyright © 1997-2008 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.